Accès gratuit
Numéro
Périnat.
Volume 13, Numéro 3, Septembre 2021
Page(s) 129 - 134
Section Article de synthèse / Review article
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/rmp-2021-0133
Publié en ligne 20 octobre 2021
  • Enquête nationale périnatale. Rapport 2016 — accessible sur : http://www.epopé-inserm.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ENP2016_rapport_complet.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Alahuhta S, Kangas-Saarela T, Hollmen AI, Edstrom HH (1990) Visceral pain during caesarean section under spinal and epidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34:95–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho B (2012) Failed epidural top-up for cesarean delivery for failure to progress in labor: the case against single-shot spinal anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 21:357–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Royal College of Anaesthetists (Great Britain) (2012) Raising the standard: a compendium of audit recipes for continuous quality improvement in anaesthesia. Colvin JR, Peden C (eds). www.rcoa.ac.uk/ARB2012 [Google Scholar]
  • de Filho GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MH, et al (2002) Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:447–51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Munhall RJ, Sukhani R, Winnie AP (1988) Incidence and etiology of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 67:843–8 [Google Scholar]
  • Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD (2004) Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:227–33 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia AT (2009) An observational prospective cohort study of incidence and characteristics of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 18:237–41 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tarkkila PJ (1991) Incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital: a prospective study. Reg Anesth 16:48–51 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kent CD, Mashour GA, Metzger NA, et al (2013) Psychological impact of unexpected explicit recall of events occurring during surgery performed under sedation, regional anaesthesia, and general anaesthesia: data from the Anesthesia Awareness Registry. Br J Anaesth 110:381–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • https://clarolineconnect.univ-lyon1.fr/resource/open/file/5401210 [Google Scholar]
  • Keïta H, Deruelle P, Bouvet L, et al (2021) Taskforce TFPB: Raising awareness to prevent, recognize and manage acute pain during cesarean delivery: the French Practice Bulletin. ACCPM [in press] [Google Scholar]
  • Réanimation. SFdA (2007) Les blocs périmédullaires chez l’adulte. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 26:720–52 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell IF (1995) Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at caesarean section under regional block. Int J Obstet Anesth 4:71–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell IF (2001) Assessing the block for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 10:83–5 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell IF (2001) The futility of using sharp pinprick (or cold) to assess spinal or epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:385–7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell IF (2004) A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:146–52 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fettes PD, Jansson JR, Wildsmith JA (2009) Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. Br J Anaesth 102:739–48 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bauer ME, Kountanis JA, Tsen LC, et al (2012) Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials. Int J Obstet Anesth 21:294–309 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guasch E, Iannuccelli F, Brogly N, Gilsanz F (2017) Failed epidural for labor: what now? Minerva Anestesiol 83:1207–13 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee S, Lew E, Lim Y, Sia AT (2009) Failure of augmentation of labor epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean delivery: a retrospective review. Anesth Analg 108:252–4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mankowitz SK, Gonzalez Fiol A, Smiley R (2016) Failure to extend epidural labor analgesia for cesarean delivery anesthesia: a focused review. Anesth Analg 123:1174–80 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Orbach-Zinger S, Friedman L, Avramovich A, et al (2006) Risk factors for failure to extend labor epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:1014–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Riley ET, Papasin J (2002) Epidural catheter function during labor predicts anesthetic efficacy for subsequent cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 11:81–4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • D’Angelo R, Smiley RM, Riley ET, Segal S (2014) Serious complications related to obstetric anesthesia: the serious complication repository project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 120:1505–12 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dadarkar P, Philip J, Weidner C, et al (2004) Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section following inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a retrospective audit. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:239–43 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Furst SR, Reisner LS (1995) Risk of high spinal anesthesia following failed epidural block for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 7:71–4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van de Velde M (2006) There is no place in modern obstetrics for racemic bupivacaine. Int J Obstet Anesth 15:38–41 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benhamou D (2019) Insuffisance d’analgésie en cours de césarienne avec anesthésie locorégionale. Conférence d’actualisation, SFAR [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.